CSU criticism of reimbursement - Federal Minister of Health Philipp Rösler defends himself and dismisses the criticism of a "three-class medicine".
The Federal Minister of Health Philipp Rösler (FDP) not only has to defend his previous steps and further plans for health reform against massive criticism from outside, he is also coming under increasing pressure from the CSU. The aim of the criticism is the prepayment when visiting the doctor.
CSU rejects increased introduction of cost reimbursement instruments In connection with the latest plans for prepayment to the doctor, CSU health expert Johannes Singhammer emphasized in an interview with the Frankfurter Rundschau: "Reimbursement of costs is and remains an exceptional case in statutory health insurance" and adds that the CSU strictly opposes the privatization of statutory health insurance. In his opinion, people are only unnecessarily unsettled by such proposals, and the reimbursement of costs would also lose important and proven instruments for controlling expenses.
Rösler defends itself against criticism from the ranks of the government coalition Rösler defends itself against the attacks from within its own ranks and lets its spokesman say that in the case of plans for reimbursement of costs in statutory health insurance, the "reimbursement (..) always (will) remain voluntary, as it is today ”. The insured should only be offered “more real options”. For example, the Federal Ministry of Health said that reimbursement instruments would create more transparency in the healthcare system and strengthen the position of patients vis-à-vis doctors. Rösler is once again following the example of private health insurance companies in order to reform the health system and secure the financing of the statutory health insurance companies on a sustainable basis. However, whether this promises success has also been extremely controversial among experts.
Consequences of the reimbursement of costs among experts controversial While Johannes Singhammer, the health expert of the CSU points out that the reimbursement systems cause a lot of administrative work for the health insurers and that there is a risk for the insured that they will stay on part of the costs of their medical bills, comments on For example, the Bundeszahnärztekammer (BZÄK) is rather positive about the current plans. The BZÄK also urged that the discussion be objectified. According to the BZÄK, it is quite wrong to link the reimbursement to "advance payment", because "as a rule, the patient pays his bill after the money has been reimbursed by the cash register," said Dr. Peter Engel, President of the BZÄK. Because the named payment term allows patients time to submit the invoice to their insurance company before payment.
It remains to be seen whether this would run so smoothly or whether the patients might have to pay for their treatment costs themselves. The planned changes are to come into force on January 1, 2011, and only then will it become clear how many insured persons are making use of the option of reimbursement instruments. (fp, 04.10.2010)
Doctors advocate reimbursement
Rösler plans to pay in advance when visiting the doctor